ReviewJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2025
Oxidative stress markers as a diagnostic tool in oral cancer and premalignant lesions: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salivary Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Markers in Oral Leukoplakia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of salivary oxidative stress markers in oral leukoplakia and oral submucous fibrosis: A cross-sectional study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral cancer is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, particularly prevalent in regions with high tobacco and betel nut consumption. The associated high mortality and morbidity rates could be reduced through early detection, prompting researchers to focus on identifying early markers of carcinogenesis. Methods: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of oxidative stress markers as diagnostic tools. An electronic search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar to identify case‒control studies published between January 2000 and June 2024 that explored the use of oxidative stress markers as diagnostic biomarkers. A manual search was also performed in relevant journals, including oral oncology and oral diseases. Initially, 38 studies were screened, and after applying the inclusion criteria, only nine studies were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results: Eight studies were conducted in India, while one was from Saudi Arabia. These studies analyzed oxidative stress markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), and leukoplakia. Control groups were matched based on age and sex, with only two studies also considering socioeconomic status. A significant difference ( Conclusion: Oxidative stress markers show promise as diagnostic and prognostic indicators. Standardized methodologies and therapeutic approaches targeting oxidative stress could enhance early detection and treatment, especially in resource-limited settings. However, the findings must be interpreted with caution due to methodological limitations, geographic bias, and the lack of inclusion of grey literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.