Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332938›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025

Ultrasound-responsive hydrogels for bone and cartilage tissue engineering.

Huajing Yang, Xinlin Li, Yameng Yu, Qi Li, Yufeng Zheng, Dandan Xia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. 3D-bioprinting for joint regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huajing YangDepartment of Dental Materials, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, 100081, China.
Xinlin LiDepartment of Dental Materials, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yameng YuDepartment of Dental Materials, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, 100081, China.
Qi LiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Xinjiang, 832008, China.
Yufeng ZhengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Dandan XiaDepartment of Dental Materials, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound-responsive hydrogels have garnered significant attention for the treatment of bone and cartilage defects owing to their non-invasive regulation, precise drug delivery, and capacity to promote tissue regeneration. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current research landscape on ultrasound-responsive hydrogels, encompassing their preparation strategies, distinctive advantages, application domains, and therapeutic mechanisms. Preparation methods predominantly involve physical and chemical cross-linking techniques, while the response mechanisms are mediated by both thermal and non-thermal effects of ultrasound. Ultrasound endows hydrogels with unique characteristics, including non-invasiveness, spatiotemporal controllability, the facilitation of cell migration, and the potential for synergistic therapy. The integration of ultrasound-responsive hydrogels with emerging technologies-such as nanotechnology and genetic engineering-has expanded their applicability in the regeneration of bone and cartilage defects, as well as in the treatment of associated infections and tumors. The underlying biological mechanisms are diverse, involving key signalling pathways such as MAPK/ERK, BMP/Smad, and HIF-1α/VEGF. In summary, ultrasound-responsive hydrogels demonstrate considerable promise and distinct advantages in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including the development of more versatile preparation strategies, more precise control over ultrasound parameters, and a deeper understanding of their mechanisms of action-all of which merit further investigation.

Indexed as

Bone regenerationCartilage regenerationMultifunctional hydrogelsTissue engineeringUltrasound-response

Identifiers

PMID41332938
PMCPMC12666586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.