Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332884›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in ophthalmology2025

Refractive index gradient in the lens: reflections on form and function and on the lens paradox.

Barbara K Pierscionek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CatExperimental eye research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Barbara K PierscionekFaculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Medical Technology Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The eye lens is a sophisticated optical element that provides the eye with both refractive power and transparency as well as the ability to change focus. The latter function diminishes with age as the lens becomes less able to change its shape. The changes with age in lens structure affect its function as a transparent refractive element but much remains misunderstood. Methods: The review considers the optical parameters of the lens, its gradient of refractive index, and how this may be formed and altered with growth and ageing. The review is structured around three axioms that relate to the creation of the refractive index, the explanation for the lens paradox, and the changes in the structural proteins and how these may be linked to opacification. Results/discussion: It is accepted that the structure/function relationship in the eye lens is explained by the distribution of its proteins forming a gradient of refractive index that provides a high level of image quality to the eye. Delving deeper into explanations for the gradient index creation, the lens paradox and the state of proteins

Indexed as

eye lenslens paradoxproteinsrefractive indexstructure/function

Identifiers

PMID41332884
PMCPMC12665519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.