ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Targeted ERAS implementation for postoperative care after Bellwether procedures in Africa: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial from Ethiopia.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: In Africa, where access to timely and safe surgical care remains limited, postoperative complications and prolonged hospital stays continue to challenge health systems. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has been shown to improve perioperative outcomes by reducing hospital length of stay (LOS) and complications, but compliance remains inconsistent. Objective: To determine whether improving ERAS compliance in Ethiopia, through a "Triple Intervention Strategy" of early postoperative feeding, ambulation, and urinary catheter removal, could reduce hospital LOS for patients undergoing laparotomy and cesarean section (CS). Methods: This study was designed as a cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted across 10 hospitals within the National Perioperative Quality Improvement Network (NaPQIN) in Ethiopia. Hospitals were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=5), which received structured ERAS training reinforced through continuous monitoring and supervision, or the control group (n=5), which continued standard perioperative care without additional reinforcement. The primary outcome was hospital LOS, and secondary outcomes included compliance with the ERAS components, determinants of LOS, and postoperative complications. Data were managed through the NaPQIN platform and analyzed using R statistical software. Results: A total of 8,256 patients were enrolled, with 5,887 (71.3%) in the intervention group and 2,369 (28.7%) in the control group. Full compliance with the ERAS bundle improved to 76.5% in the intervention group compared to 57.9% in controls (p < 0.001). Patients in the intervention group had a significantly shorter LOS (mean 80.75 vs. 89.24 hours; p < 0.001). The intervention group also had significantly fewer postoperative complications (2.1% vs 4.8%; p < 0.001), and more patients were discharged without any complications. Conclusions and Relevance: This pragmatic trial, enabled by a national perioperative data system, demonstrated that the targeted implementation of postoperative ERAS elements, early oral feeding, mobilization, and timely urinary catheter removal significantly improved compliance and reduced hospital stay without requiring additional resources. While full ERAS pathways remain the ideal, focused, context-adapted strategies can offer scalable benefits in LMIC settings burdened by surgical backlogs and limited perioperative capacity. Broader adoption should prioritize tailored integration, ongoing evaluation, and provider engagement to maximize system-wide impact. Trial Registration:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.