ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
The Effect of Treating Hearing Loss with Hearing Aids on Plasma Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Promising evidence indicates that treating hearing loss with hearing aids (HAs) could reduce dementia risk. We extend this evidence by investigating the effect of HAs on plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Methods: We emulated two target trials using observational data from Australian participants of the ASPREE study. Eligible participants had self-reported hearing problems, no past HA use, and were dementia-free. HA prescriptions and frequency of HA use were measured by questionnaire. Phosphorylated-tau181 (pTau181), neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and amyloid-β (Aβ) 42/40 were measured after approximately 6-8 years. We estimated the effect of new HA prescription (first target trial) and the frequency of HA use (second target trial) using targeted maximum likelihood estimation, with multiple imputation for missing data. Results: Across imputed datasets, a median of 2842 eligible individuals were included (mean age 75 years, 48% female), with a median of 735 receiving a new HA prescription. Among survivors, the estimated mean differences comparing HA prescription and no HA prescription were 1.8 pg/mL (95% CI: -0.6, 4.1), 0.1 pg/mL (-7.8, 8.0), -2.2 pg/mL (-14.5, 10.1), and -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2) for the concentrations of pTau181, NfL, GFAP, and (Aβ42 × 1000)/Aβ40, respectively. Mean differences did not differ substantially across levels of potential baseline effect modifiers, including APOE-ε4 genotype and cognition. Conclusion: In community-dwelling older people with hearing loss and no dementia, we found minimal effects of HA prescription and frequency of HA use on plasma ADRD biomarkers after a 7-year follow-up.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.