ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Validation of a blood test for multi-cancer risk stratification in a lung cancer screening cohort.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We report a blinded validation study of a ten-protein marker blood test for assessing risk of developing or harboring nine common cancers in a prospective lung cancer screening cohort. Patients and Methods: The foundation of the multi-cancer risk stratification test (MCaST), test is a 4-marker protein panel consisting of ProSFTPB, CEA, CA125, and CYFRA-21 which has been extensively validated for risk of lung cancer and which has been expanded to include six additional markers to encompass, in addition to lung cancer, prostate, colorectal, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, liver, esophageal, and stomach cancers. Blinded validation samples consisted of 1,235 plasmas collected prior to diagnosis from 171 cancer cases and 526 randomly selected non-case controls. Fixed individualized combination rules as well as cancer-specific risk thresholds predefined based on established clinical guidelines were applied. Results: At the subject level, the MCaST tested positive for imminent risk of lung cancer in 65 of 73 lung cancer cases, including 45 of 51 early-stage cases, with a median time of 12.7 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.7 - 27.8 months) between the first positive MCaST and diagnosis of lung cancer. The positive rate of MCaST for other cancers was 88.9% for prostate, 63.6% for invasive breast, 85.7% for CRC, 50% for ovarian, 50% for pancreatic, and 67% for esophagus plus stomach cancers with a median (IQR) time of 20.7 months (10.2 - 42.8 months) from the first positive MCaST to a clinical diagnosis across the cancer types. Overall accuracy for tissue-of-origin (TOO) signal was 94.6%, and as high as 98.1% for lung cancer. Conclusion: MCaST has utility for assessing cancer risk for common and lethal solid cancers in this smoker population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.