ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Inferring rheumatoid arthritis disease activity status from the electronic health records across health systems to enable real-world data studies.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Disease activity plays a central role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical studies. However, RA disease activity is inconsistently recorded in real-world electronic health records (EHR) data limiting the generation of real-world evidence (RWE). This study aimed to develop and validate scalable machine learning (ML) models to infer RA disease activity from EHR data. Methods: We conducted studies from EHR data from Mass General Brigham (MGB) and the Veterans Affairs (VA); both have RA registries with prospectively collected disease activity score 28 (DAS28). The features for the algorithm were extracted from the EHR including structured data, e.g., ICD codes and narrative data using natural language processing (NLP). Machine learning models were trained on the registry-collected DAS28.We tested within-institution trained model performance and across systems transportability. The association between inferred disease activity and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was tested with stratified Cox models to test face-validity. Results: We studied 1105 MGB and 2631 VA RA patients. Models with structured data models achieved an AUC of 0.68-0.70; models incorporating structured and NLP achieved higher performance (AUC=0.843, MGB; 0.833, VA). Cross-site validation demonstrated reduced transportability (AUC=0.679, MGB→VA; 0.718, VA→MGB), due to differences in the important feature. Within institution, inferred disease activity was significantly associated with increased risk for incident MACE (MGB: HR=1.12; VA: HR=1.14). Conclusion: RA disease activity can be inferred at scale from within-institution EHR data, though cross-institution performance is limited. The inferred disease activity replicated association between RA and MACE and supports it's use in future studies to generate RWE.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.