ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2025
Awareness and use of emergency contraception among women attending antenatal clinic in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the knowledge and use of emergency contraception (EC) amongst antenatal care attendees at the Federal Medical Center, Bida (FMCB), Nigeria. Material and Methods: This was a cross-sectional, hospital-based, descriptive study involving women attending routine check-up at antenatal clinic of FMCB. Self-administered questionnaires were completed by the women after having obtained written informed consents. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 23.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York, USA). Descriptive statistical analysis was employed. Statistical significance was set at a p value of <0.05. Results: This research involved 129 women and demonstrated that only 43 (33.3%) had any knowledge of EC. Eighteen of these (41.9%) had their source of information from health workers followed by friends and peers (n=12, 27.9%) and one (2.3%) from public health campaign. Only 17.5% had used EC, with the majority (65.2%) using levonorgestrel pills, 13.1% used an intrauterine contraceptive device and 3.3% used the combined oral contraceptive pills. About two-thirds (67.4%) had no idea when EC would be effective. Age, tertiary level of education, religion, ethnicity, and upper socioeconomic status were all significantly associated with awareness of EC. Conclusion: The majority of the women in our cohort were not aware of EC and the proportion who had used EC was even lower. Therefore, there is a need to increase the awareness and effective use of EC through health education and advocacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.