ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
PCLIPtools: A Robust Framework for Identifying RNA-Protein Interaction Sites from PAR-CLIP experiments.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PAR-CLIP is a widely used method for identifying binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) transcriptome-wide. A characteristic T-to-C transition in the sequenced cDNA pinpoints the site of RBP-RNA crosslinking and is induced by the use of a photoreactive uridine analogue, 4-thiouridine (4SU). As with other systems-wide methods, PAR-CLIP, too, is prone to false discoveries as the T-to-C signal might result from systematic noise, pre-existing SNPs, and PCR errors. Therefore, rigorous statistical methods are required for analyzing PAR-CLIP data. The few existing tools to analyze PAR-CLIP data lack updates and sufficient documentation, and often fail to process current higher-depth sequencing data. Here we report PCLIPtools, a lightweight, customizable suite for analyzing PAR-CLIP data. PCLIPtools considers the read depth, T-to-C transitions, and the other mutations to statistically estimate high-confidence interaction sites. Benchmarking shows that PCLIPtools identifies more functionally significant targets than the current standard tool, PARalyzer, without losing high-confidence sites and outperforming it in runtime. Exploratory analyses show PCLIPtools' specific targets are enriched for read depth and T-to-C conversion, supporting their validity. With simplicity, robustness, and speed, PCLIPtools improves the precision of PAR-CLIP data analysis while being accessible to experimental RNA biologists. PCLIPtools can be found on github (https://github.com/paulahsan/pcliptools).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.