Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332790›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Probabilistic working memory representations in human cortex guide behavior.

Ying Zhou, Clayton E Curtis, Daryl Fougnie, Kartik K Sreenivasan

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying ZhouDivision of Science and Mathematics, New York University Abu Dhabi.
Clayton E CurtisDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University.
Daryl FougnieDivision of Science and Mathematics, New York University Abu Dhabi.
Kartik K SreenivasanDivision of Science and Mathematics, New York University Abu Dhabi.ORCID 0000-0002-5103-1179

Funding

Putting Priority Map Theory to the TestR01EY016407 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, CLAYTON E · 2006 to 2023
$5.8M
The Nature of Working Memory RepresentationsR01EY033925 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, CLAYTON E · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016407NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of working memory make fundamentally different commitments to the architecture of individual memories. Information-sparse models conceptualize individual memories as single point estimates agnostic to meta-cognitive variables such as uncertainty. In contrast, information-rich models propose memories are encoded as probability distributions over feature space that embed memory uncertainty in the shape of the distribution. To distinguish these accounts, we constructed probability distributions of memory from participant's iterative reports of motion direction on each trial. Remarkably, the idiosyncratic shape of these distributions (e.g., asymmetry) on single trials matched the shape of neural probability distributions decoded from fMRI patterns measured from occipital and parietal cortex. Consistent with information-rich models, the neural representation of an individual memory encodes more than the memorized feature; its variance (i.e., width and asymmetry) encodes idiosyncrasies whose read-out predicts memory behavior.

Indexed as

BayesiandecodingfMRImemory-guided decisionsprobabilistic population codinguncertaintyworking memory

Identifiers

PMID41332790
PMCPMC12667906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.