Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332689›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Accurate Reconstruction of Circular RNAs from Complex Rolling Circular Long Reads with CircPlex.

Tasfia Zahin, Irtesam Mahmud Khan, Mingfu Shao

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tasfia ZahinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-7040-210X
Irtesam Mahmud KhanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-518X
Mingfu ShaoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6112-5139

Funding

Computational Methods for Assembling Multiple RNA-seq SamplesR01HG011065 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SHAO, MINGFU · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rolling circle amplification (RCA) coupled with long-read sequencing has emerged as a powerful strategy for detecting full-length circular RNAs (circRNAs). Such protocols produce long reads that are normally composed of several tandemly repeated copies of the original circRNA. The circRNA sequence can be reconstructed through detecting the repeating unit of the long reads, which are aligned to the genome to validate and to identify back-splice junctions (BSJs). We revealed a previously unrecognized phenomenon: a substantial fraction of long reads contain complex repeat patterns in which the repeating unit consists of a sequence combined with its partial reverse complement. In these cases, only the original sequence corresponds to the true circRNA, while the concatenated pattern may produce false circRNAs and misidentify correct circRNAs. We present a new approach CircPlex that extracts the authentic circRNA sequence from these complex repeat units, overcoming the limitations of standard repeat-based consensus prediction. Comparison with isoCirc annotations and circRNA database demonstrates that a significant number of BSJs and full-length sequences, previously ignored, can be recovered. Our results suggest that leveraging partially repetitive reads from RCA-based sequencing can substantially increase circRNA detection sensitivity and uncover novel isoforms, providing a more comprehensive view of the circular transcriptome.

Identifiers

PMID41332689
PMCPMC12668013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.