Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332685›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Harmonized Protocol for Segmentation of the Hippocampal Tail on High-Resolution

Robin de Flores, Kelsey L Canada, Thackery Brown, Nicole J Gervais, Anne Maass, Gustaf Rådman, Jonathan Shine, Hannah L Tucker, Eóin N Molloy, Jenna N Adams and 18 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Robin de FloresNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, UA20 Neuropresage, 14000 Caen, France.
Kelsey L CanadaUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst.
Thackery BrownSchool of Psychology, Center for Research and Education in Navigation (CRaNE), Georgia Institute of Technology.
Nicole J GervaisUniversity of Groningen.
Anne MaassGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7889-795X
Gustaf RådmanLund University.
Jonathan ShineGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
Hannah L TuckerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University.
Eóin N MolloyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
Jenna N AdamsDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California Irvine.
Michelle Baca ReinkeSan Jose State University.
Arnold BakkerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David BerronGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1558-1883
Marshall A DaltonUniversity of Sydney.
Kristen M KennedyCenter for Vital Longevity, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas.ORCID 0000-0001-5373-9026
Renaud LaJoieMemory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2581-8100
Susanne G MuellerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
Noa OfenCenter for Vital Longevity, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas.
Rosanna K OlsenBaycrest Academy for Research and Education, University of Toronto.ORCID 0000-0002-2918-4152
Naftali RazStony Brook University, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Tracy RigginsUniversity of Maryland.
Karen M RodrigueCenter for Vital Longevity, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas.ORCID 0000-0002-4781-7961
Craig StarkUniversity of California Irvine.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-8502
Lei WangRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education, University of Toronto.
Laura E M WisseDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University.
Paul A YushkevichDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-8543-4016
Valerie A CarrSan Jose State University.
Ana M DaughertyWayne State University.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at the University of California, IrvineP30AG066519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Crystal M. Glover · 2020 to 2026
$27.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072931 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Henry L Paulson · 2021 to 2026
$26.5M
DEVELOPMENT OF MEMORY NETWORKS IN CHILDRENR01MH107512 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Noa Ofen · 2016 to 2026
$5.0M
NEURAL CORRELATES OF AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN MEMORYR01AG011230 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DAUGHERTY, ANA MARIE, RAZ, NAFTALI · 1993 to 2020
$4.8M
A harmonized medial temporal lobe subregion segmentation protocol: an essential element for dementia researchR01AG070592 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Ana Marie Daugherty, Rosanna Kathleen Olsen · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Influences of Environmental Geometry and Aging on Cognitive Mapping MechanismsR01AG073250 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Thackery Ian Brown · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
Ex Vivo Imaging of the Aging Brain to Discover Morphology/Pathology AssociationsRF1AG056014 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YUSHKEVICH, PAUL A. · 2023 to 2023
$2.1M
Hippocampal-Memory Network Development and Episodic Memory in Early ChildhoodR01HD079518 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI RIGGINS, TRACY L. · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
Improving the sensitivity and specificity of MRI-based biomarkers in Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG069474 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WOLK, DAVID A, YUSHKEVICH, PAUL A. · 2024 to 2025
$1.4M
An integrative multisite study of the influence of socioeconomic disparities on hippocampal subfields developmental trajectoriesF32HD108960 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CANADA, KELSEY LEIGH · 2022 to 2024
$224k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931NIA NIH HHS R01 AG011230NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069474NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070592NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073250NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG056014NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD108960NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079518NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hippocampus is a heterogeneous structure with cytoarchitectonically distinct subfields that exhibit heterogeneous lifespan trajectories and are differentially susceptible to diseases. Advances in high-resolution imaging have accelerated research on these structures, yet variability in segmentation protocols limits cross-study comparability. The Hippocampal Subfields Group (HSG) is an international consortium addressing this challenge by developing a reliable, accessible, and freely available segmentation protocol for high-resolution T2-weighted 3 tesla MRI scans (http://www.hippocampalsubfields.com). Here, we present the harmonized protocol for the posterior portion of the hippocampus (the "tail"), complementing the previously established "body" protocol, and with an anterior "head" protocol under development. The tail protocol provides standardized definitions of the external boundaries for the posterior-most extent of the hippocampus, facilitating consistent segmentation from surrounding tissues. The research community was extensively involved through an online survey that incorporated comprehensive protocol details, feasibility assessments, tutorial videos, and illustrative segmentations. Through this collaborative process, consensus emerged to exclude subfield labeling in the hippocampal tail due to limited visibility of internal landmarks and substantial anatomical variability in this region. All proposed boundary guidelines were deemed clear and agreed upon via a Delphi procedure. The harmonized tail protocol has high intra- (Averaged ICC(2,1) > 0.98; Averaged Dice Similarity Coefficient = 0.92) and inter-rater reliability (Averaged ICC(2,k) > 0.98; Averaged Dice Similarity Coefficient = 0.86) and offers a practical framework for replicable segmentation. By establishing standardized guidelines, this protocol enhances comparability of findings across developmental, aging, and clinical research and is compatible with ongoing technological advances.

Identifiers

PMID41332685
PMCPMC12667945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.