ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Group social conditions and environment predict foraging behavior in wild baboons.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For group-living animals, conditions in the physical and social environments are closely linked to foraging outcomes, but the nature and causal direction of many aspects of these relationships remain unclear. Here, we use long-term data from a well-studied population of wild baboons in Amboseli, Kenya, to examine how group-level social traits (group size and social network density) and climate variables (rainfall and temperature) are linked to two types of foraging outcomes for adult female baboons: (i) foraging-related time budgets and (ii) diet composition (time spent on fallback foods, such as grass corms, versus high-energy foods). We find that rainfall and temperature interact to predict multiple foraging outcomes: more rainfall is associated with more time spent feeding, less time spent walking without feeding, and more feeding time spent on grass corms, but this influence is more pronounced in hotter years than in cooler years. Females in intermediate-sized groups spend more time walking without feeding than those in other groups, but group size does not significantly predict other foraging-related outcomes (i.e., time spent feeding or diet composition). We also find that females in groups with denser social networks spend less time feeding, and less time feeding on grass corms, than those in sparser networks. However, in a preliminary causal analysis meant to further explore this result, we find support for the hypothesis that this relationship is driven by effects of foraging on social behavior, as opposed to effects of network density on foraging: more time spent eating grass corms leads to lower social network density and more time spent feeding. Our results show how the social and the physical environments are linked to foraging outcomes, and highlight the importance of future studies of their pattern and mechanism.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.