ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Performance of Information Theory Derived: Semantic Similarity Algorithms for Differential Diagnosis and Clustering.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Semantic similarity analysis with Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) enables fuzzy, specificity weighted comparisons of clinical manifestations of individuals and diseases and can be used to support differential diagnostics or to stratify cohorts. Many methods have been proposed to calculate semantic similarity for various applications, including the Phenomizer, which calculates the average best match over all terms in the query and disease, and set-based methods ranging from the Jaccard Intersection to methods that leverage the conditional information content to calculate similarity. However, these methods have not been described under a single mathematical model or robustly compared using a comprehensive data set. Here, we describe several semantic similarity algorithms using derivations based on information theory, propose three of our own variations to these models, and compare the performance of each approach for differential diagnostic ranking and phenotypic clustering. We find that Phenomizer performs better when diseases are ranked by similarity alone, without generating p-values. Additionally, non-normalized algorithms that use conditional information perform similarly to Phenomizer for differential diagnosis. In contrast, normalized algorithms perform best when clustering cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.