ReviewScientifica2025
Computational Landscape in Drug Discovery: From AI/ML Models to Translational Application.
Review in Scientifica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular basis of precision nutrition: Food components, microbiome-derived metabolites, and multi-omics modeling.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Harnessing Machine Learning for Accelerated Drug Discovery: Opportunities and Unmet Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence revolutionizing CNS drug discovery and development.Drug discovery today · 2026Review
- From Algorithms to Assets: A Comprehensive Review of AI's Role in Preclinical Drug Discovery and the Hurdles to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Open-Source Molecular Docking and AI-Augmented Structure-Based Drug Design: Current Workflows, Challenges, and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Vaccines for microbial eye diseases in the era of data science: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- An integrative machine learning, explainable AI, molecular simulation, and cytotoxicity validation framework for the discovery of selective SIRT1 inhibitors against triple negative breast cancer.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in drug discovery has significantly transformed traditional pharmaceutical research by enabling data-driven decision-making, accelerating the identification of hits, and improving the efficiency of lead optimization. This review provides a comprehensive overview of AI/ML models, including supervised, unsupervised, semisupervised, deep learning, and reinforcement learning approaches and their applications across various stages of drug development, from target identification and virtual screening to de novo molecule design and ADME/T prediction. We highlight widely used ML algorithms, performance evaluation metrics, and AI-driven tools that have become instrumental in modern drug discovery pipelines. Despite rapid advancements, challenges such as limited data availability, heterogeneity, bias, lack of model interpretability, reproducibility concerns, clinical translational barriers, and regulatory uncertainties continue to hinder full-scale adoption. The review also discusses emerging trends, including explainable AI, federated learning, and integration with high-throughput experimental platforms, which offer promising directions for overcoming current limitations. Emphasis is placed on the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to bridge computational predictions with experimental validation, ensuring robust, ethical, and clinically translatable AI applications in drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.