ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Transforming surgical care and safety: dissecting the impact of checklists in the global south.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Exploratory Survey.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Capacity building through workforce training and community engagement for Surgical, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia (SOTA) care: Case studies from South Asia.Dialogues in health · 2026Review
- Attitudes Toward Patient Safety in Operating Rooms: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the French Version of the Operating Room Management Attitudes Questionnaire (ORMAQ).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical errors and preventable harm remain major public health concerns, especially in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) was developed as a low-cost, high-impact tool to improve surgical outcomes and enhance patient safety. This review examines how the SSC functions both as a safeguard against preventable errors and as a driving force for reducing morbidity and mortality in surgical care. Drawing on evidence from LMICs, we examine the checklist's impact on reducing surgical errors, associated complications, morbidity, and mortality, while also fostering better team communication and accountability in operating rooms. Despite SSC's proven benefits, its implementation in LMICs remains inconsistent due to barriers such as hierarchical team dynamics, limited training, infrastructure gaps, and lack of leadership support. The article highlights approach such as including structured training programs, hands-on demonstrations, workshops and the use of digital tools and platforms for better SSC implementation. It also emphasizes the role of local champions, leadership endorsement, local adaptations and regular audits with feedback to sustain adherence and foster a culture of surgical safety. Strengthening these efforts can transform the SSC from a procedural formality into a powerful tool for surgical safety, providing a practical pathway to enhance patient safety and quality in global surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.