ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Postcoarctectomy syndrome: a contemporary systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postcoarctectomy syndrome is a serious but poorly understood complication that can occur following surgical or endovascular repair of coarctation of the aorta. This condition presents with severe abdominal pain, persistent hypertension, and gastrointestinal symptoms that can be life-threatening if not promptly recognized and treated. Despite being a known complication for decades, the underlying mechanisms of postcoarctectomy syndrome remain unclear, creating challenges for both early diagnosis and effective treatment. We present the case of a patient with postcoarctectomy syndrome and a systematic review analyzing the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, and treatment strategies for this complication. We also conduct a systematic literature review, identify key knowledge gaps, and propose future research priorities to address them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.