ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Accurate Runs of Homozygosity Estimation From Low Coverage Genome Sequences in Non-Model Species.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Structure and Selection Signals in Hetian Gray Donkeys and Xinjiang Donkeys from Xinjiang, China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Accurate Runs of Homozygosity Estimation From Low Coverage Genome Sequences in Non-Model Species.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- The Genomic Signature of Demographic Decline in a Long-Distance Migrant in a Range-Extreme Population.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Runs of homozygosity (ROH) are increasingly being analysed using whole genome sequences in non-model species as a measure of inbreeding and to assess demographic history, thus providing useful information for conservation. However, most studies have used Plink for ROH inference which performs poorly when sequencing depth is below 10×, often underestimating ROH. This can lead to erroneous status assessment and poor management decisions. We assessed the performance of ROHan, a program developed for ROH and heterozygosity estimation using lower coverage sequences that have so far only been optimised for human data. Using high coverage whole genomes from 22 caribou, a non-model species at risk presenting varying levels of inbreeding, we assessed the effects of sequencing depth (1-15×), the input parameter 'rohmu' that determines the heterozygosity rate that is tolerated within ROH regions, and demographic history on the ROH inference and heterozygosity. Accurate estimation of the percentage of the genome and lengths of ROH could be achieved at depths as low as 3-5×. However, the rohmu parameter and individual demographic history had a significant effect on the results. Heterozygosity was also overestimated at low depth. Using our optimised rohmu parameter, we re-analysed low coverage sequences from a small and isolated caribou population and demonstrated high inbreeding levels that had previously been missed. We provide recommendations for optimisation of the rohmu parameter and demonstrate the need for careful interpretation of outputs to enable robust ROH inference using low coverage whole genome sequences in wildlife species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.