Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332342›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2026

Evaluation of buprenorphine as optimisation of postoperative analgesia in feral cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy under field conditions.

V Heitzmann, A Diggelmann, E Goldinger, A Schiele

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, VeterinaryClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V HeitzmannSection of Anaesthesiology, Department of Clinical Services and Diagnostics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2911-9112
A DiggelmannSection of Anaesthesiology, Department of Clinical Services and Diagnostics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
E GoldingerTiermedizinisches Zentrum AG, Müllheim, Germany.
A SchieleSection of Anaesthesiology, Department of Clinical Services and Diagnostics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4992-9592

Funding

Network for Animal Protection (NetAP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this prospective, randomised, blinded, observational clinical study was to investigate the effect of subcutaneously administered buprenorphine on postoperative pain in female feral cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy as part of a trap-neuter-return programme. The aim was to determine whether buprenorphine can prevent pain scores from exceeding established intervention thresholds postoperatively - a problem identified in a previous study using the same anaesthetic protocol. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 115 cats were anaesthetised with an intramuscular protocol comprising medetomidine, ketamine and butorphanol, in combination with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (meloxicam). Prior to anaesthesia induction, cats were randomly assigned to either receive 0.02 mg/kg buprenorphine (BUP group) or an equal volume of saline (NaCl 0.9%) (control group) subcutaneously at the end of surgery. Pain was assessed at 3, 6 and 24 hours postoperatively using the validated feline Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale.

resultsSubcutaneous administration of buprenorphine at the end of surgery did not significantly reduce postoperative pain scores or prevent values from exceeding the clinical intervention threshold compared to saline. Although numerical differences were observed at specific time points, pain trajectories over time were similar between groups. Notably, overall and independently of the group 34.5% of cats exceeded the intervention threshold at 3 hours and 38.8% at 6 hours postoperatively, underscoring the need for improved analgesic strategies during the early postoperative period in trap-neuter-return settings. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that a single subcutaneous dose of buprenorphine may not consistently enhance analgesia over standard multimodal protocols under field conditions.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineHysterectomyOvariectomyPostoperative PainAnimalsCatsFemaleInjections, SubcutaneousPain MeasurementProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphine

Identifiers

PMID41332342
PMCPMC13050595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.