ReviewClinical transplantation and research2026
Immunological considerations and outcomes in cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation.
Review in Clinical transplantation and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has transformed reconstructive surgery for patients with severe tissue defects. Nonetheless, donor shortages remain a major limitation. Cross-sex VCA (CS-VCA) has been proposed as a means of expanding the donor pool, but concerns persist regarding potentially heightened rejection risks in sex-mismatched transplants. This review examines published adult CS-VCA cases up to May 2025. The primary outcomes analyzed were acute rejection episodes, allograft survival, immunological complications, and sequelae affecting form and function. Nine CS-VCA cases were identified (six upper extremity, one lower extremity, and two abdominal wall transplants). Eight involved female donors (median age, 47 years) and male recipients (median age, 30 years). Acute rejection occurred in five of nine cases; however, 11 of 13 allografts remained viable at follow-up (6-41 months) under immunosuppressive therapy. Two cases developed vascular complications, resulting in technical failure and partial amputation, respectively. Higher human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (mean, 5) were associated with complications, while fewer mismatches (mean, 3) correlated with better outcomes. In contrast to trends in solid organ transplantation, female-to-male CS-VCA demonstrated relatively favorable outcomes in the limited cases reported. These findings suggest that CS-VCA may be a feasible strategy to expand the VCA donor pool, provided that patient selection is careful, ABO/Rh and HLA compatibility are prioritized, and rigorous immunological monitoring is maintained. Further studies should investigate sex-specific immune mechanisms to optimize long-term success rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.