ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Strengthening community-based fisheries monitoring programs with Indigenous perspectives.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strengthening community-based fisheries monitoring programs with Indigenous perspectives.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based monitoring (CBM) programs are increasingly recognized as essential for adaptive environmental stewardship. Yet, the CBM literature often highlights successful cases and privileges evaluations by external experts over those of community members themselves. To address this gap, we drew on insights from 23 semistructured interviews with Cree fishers, community members, and program administrators of the James Bay Cree Nation of Wemindji (Eeyou Istchee, northern Québec). The respondents participated in a 22-year subsistence fishing monitoring program. Interviews explored participants' experiences with the program and their interpretations of interannual variations in fishing activity based on the monitoring data. Although a general decline in annual fish catches was observed, data accuracy and utility were constrained by inconsistencies in monitoring protocols. Respondents identified several opportunities for improvement, including expanding fishers' roles beyond data collection; incorporating Cree knowledge, particularly women's knowledge, in program design; and ensuring the timely and accessible communication of results. Our findings showed that CBM initiatives grounded in full Indigenous participation at all stages-from design to data interpretation and use-can enhance both program outcomes and self-determined environmental stewardship. To support similar efforts elsewhere, we codeveloped an evaluation rubric outlining key criteria for assessing and strengthening current and future Indigenous CBM programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.