ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Characterizing the Heartbeat-Evoked Potential: A Two-Component Model of Cardiac Signal Processing?
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Heartbeat-Evoked Responses in M/EEG: A Systematic Review of Methods With Suggestions for Analysis and Reporting.Psychophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Review of methods to derive the heartbeat-evoked potential: past practices and future directions.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Review
- I sync, therefore I am: brain-body synchrony in typical and disordered consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Review
- Characterizing the Heartbeat-Evoked Potential: A Two-Component Model of Cardiac Signal Processing?Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) is a potential marker of cardiac signal integration at the cerebral level, obtained by averaging epochs time-locked to the ECG R-peaks. The HEP is modulated across different experimental conditions with amplitude differences arising between 200 and 600 ms post-R-peak over fronto-central sites. However, substantial heterogeneity exists, and to date there is no clear characterization of the HEP. Here, we propose a two-component model of the HEP consisting of first, an early (100-250 ms) component presumed to index primary cardiac signal integration, thus being task independent; and second a late (250-500 ms) component thought to index elaborative processes, supposed to be modulated both within and between tasks. We aimed to first delineate these components together with their frequency characteristics at rest before exploring their modulation during an emotion task and a tactile stimulation protocol, using independent datasets for exploratory and reproducibility purposes, totaling 104 participants from different cultures. Our results revealed an early (100-250 ms) fronto-central negativity potentially associated with theta phase resetting, followed by a posterior positivity (250-500 ms). As expected, we did not observe any intra or inter-task modulation of the early component. However, contrary to our hypothesis, the late component was not modulated by task neither. This lack of task-related modulation in the late component contrasts with previous literature but appears robust given that our study design used multiple datasets, participants and experimental protocols. Our findings highlight the need for standardized methodologies in HEP research to improve reproducibility and enhance our understanding of cardiac-related neural processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.