Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332142›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025

Reevaluating Anomalous Electric Fields at the Air-Water Interface: A Surface-Specific Spectroscopic Survey.

Joseph C Shirley, Zi Xuan Ng, Kuo-Yang Chiang, Yuki Nagata, Yair Litman, Arsh S Hazrah, Mischa Bonn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Visible light leaves evaporation and interfacial structure of neat water unchanged at the air-water interface.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Electric-field-driven COChemical science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph C ShirleyMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1697-7620
Zi Xuan NgMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, Mainz 55128, Germany.
Kuo-Yang ChiangMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5446-0270
Yuki NagataMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-6641
Yair LitmanMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6890-4052
Arsh S HazrahMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4413-521X
Mischa BonnMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6851-8453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The notion that large electric fields at the air-water interface catalyze spontaneous chemical reactions has sparked significant debate, with far reaching implications for atmospheric chemistry and interfacial reactivity. Using vibrational sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy, we test this hypothesis within the framework of this surface-specific method, comparing local electric field strengths at the air-water interface and in bulk water. By applying established vibrational frequency-to-field mappings to the OH stretch of interfacial and bulk water, we extract effective electric field distributions under ambient conditions. Contrary to prevailing claims, our SFG results reveal no spectroscopic evidence within this method for exceptionally strong or long-lived interfacial electric fields. Instead, bulk water consistently exhibits broader field distributions. The absence of key spectral signatures, such as red-shifted continua, or slowed spectral diffusion, further undermines the idea of anomalous surface fields. Our findings suggest that exceptionally large, long-lived interfacial fields are unlikely. This calls into question interpretations that attribute droplet chemistry primarily to such electric fields.

Identifiers

PMID41332142
PMCPMC12715790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.