ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Surgical retrieval of an embolized atrial septal occluder device from the abdominal aorta: a rare case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn selected patients, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASD) with atrial septal occluder (ASO) devices has showed outstanding results. However, in very rare cases, there is a risk of device embolization. PRESENTATION OF CASE: This case is of a 16-year-old female, who presented to the paediatric outpatient department with acute abdominal pain. As a 9-year-old she was treated for an ASD with the implantation of ASO device. Five months after the treatment, the ASO was found to be embolised to the abdominal aorta. Another ASO device was implanted but transcatheter retrieval of the embolised ASO device was unsuccessful. Due to the very young age of the patient and her being asymptomatic, the patient was indicated for conservative management. The patient was asymptomatic for 7 years, where after the patient started having acute abdominal pain attacks and postprandial nausea, for which the surgical retrieval was indicated and successfully performed by open aortic surgery. DISCUSSION: Device embolization, reported in up to 0.5 % of cases, can be potentially fatal. In most cases, embolization occurs in the first 72 h, and immediate transcatheter retrieval is recommended, with open surgery being an efficient alternative if transcatheter retrieval fails.
conclusionASO device embolization should be promptly diagnosed and treated by a multidisciplinary team to achieve the best results. Open surgical retrieval of the occluder devices is a safe and a highly effective alternative method to retrieve embolised devices when transcatheter retrieval fails.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.