ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Should we ligate coronary conduits when flow measurements indicate competitive flow? a case report.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompetitive flow (CF) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) occurs when graft flow is impaired due to higher competing flow from either the native circulation or another graft and may result in functional graft occlusion. We report a case of functional graft occlusion of a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) due to flow competition with a saphenous vein graft (SVG) and discuss the rationale of ligating the graft responsible for the CF. CASE PRESENTATION: The case refers to a 56-year-old man with an isolated subtotal ostial left anterior descending (LAD) lesion who underwent conventional double on-pump CABG with an in situ (LIMA) to the LAD and a centrally anastomosed SVG to the Diagonal branch (D1). Concerning the initial Transit-time flow measurements (TTFM), the SVG had a mean graft flow (MGF) of 49 ml/min, a Pulsatility index (PI) of 1 and a Diastolic flow (DF) of 66%. The LIMA graft had an MGF of 31 ml/minute, a PI of 3.8, a DF of 80%, but a Backward flow (BF) of 8%. As the LIMA BF was quite high, we suspected competitive flow of the graft and thus decided to transiently apply a bulldog clamp to the SVG, to check if the LIMA TTFM would change. Indeed, MGF was 44 ml/minute, the PI was 2.3, DF was 60%, and BF was 0.9%. Despite these results, the operating surgeon did not alter the revascularization plan and the operation was finished. The patient was discharged uneventfully. However, in a 6-month follow-up, the patient was symptomatic and with poor ejection fraction, and the diagnostic work-up revealed the functional occlusion of the LIMA graft with a string sign, and a patent SVG. After Heart Team consultation and patient update, he underwent left main stent implantation.
conclusionsThere should be a great degree of suspicion for CF with high BF values, even when the rest of the parameters measured during TTFM are normal or marginal. Also, the location of the LAD stenosis proximal to the D1 is a risk factor for CF when both arteries are grafted. Changing the revascularization plan based on TTFM is warranted for optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.