ArticleTrials2025
The outcome of injured cervical spinal cord with uncontrolled swelling under duraplasty: protocol of the ISCUD randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Outcome of Injured Cervical Spinal Cord with Uncontrolled Swelling Under Duraplasty
Efficacy and Safety of Bony Decompression Combined With Dural Decompression Versus Isolated Bony Decompression for Acute Severe Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCIs) are the most prevalent type of traumatic spinal cord injury, marked by high disability rates, considerable medical expenses, and a poor prognosis for functional recovery. The clinical effectiveness of bony decompression in improving functional outcomes following TSCI remains limited, even when performed ultra-early (within 12 or 8 h), emphasizing the uncertainty and insufficient understanding of the extent of adequate decompression. The ISCUD trial aims (1) to evaluate the benefits and risks of combining expansive duroplasty with standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone; (2) to investigate whether spinal cord perfusion status, assessed by indocyanine green, is related to the development of spinal cord swelling as measured by intramedullary lesion length; and (3) to determine the necessity for additional expansive duroplasty based on these assessments.
methodsThis is a prospective, phase III, single-center, randomized controlled superiority trial. We aim to recruit 104 adults with acute, severe, traumatic cervical spinal cord injury with an American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade A, B, or C who will be randomized 1:1 to undergo bony decompression alone or bony decompression with duroplasty. Patients and outcome assessors are blinded to study arm. The primary outcome is the change in motor score at 6 months compared to admission; while the secondary outcome assess the sensory score, the neurological outcome, the assessments of function (grasp, walking, urinary and anal sphincter control), quality of life at 6 months, the safety of duroplasty, the impact of mechanistic study on the patient's recovery. The ISCUD trial aims to establish qualitative and quantitative selection criteria for cervical TSCIs patients who may experience additional benefits from receiving expansive duroplasty. Estimated study duration is 24 months (1 month set-up, 12 months recruitment, 12 months to complete follow-up, 2 months data analysis and reporting results). DISCUSSION: The current clinical management guidelines for spinal cord injury are fundamentally informed by principles derived from the management of traumatic brain injury. The ISCUD trial not only tests the hypothesis that additional duroplasty is beneficial to patients with cervical TSCIs but also incorporates mechanistic study results with clinical outcomes to provide qualitative and quantitative criteria for neurosurgeons to determine whether additional duroplasty should be performed.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT06552507. Registered on 2024/08/14.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.