ArticleBMC oral health2025
Antimicrobial peptides derived from human ameloblastin targeting biofilms.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral biofilm-related diseases, such as dental caries and periodontitis, remain among the most prevalent global health issues and are increasingly complicated by antibiotic resistance and biofilm persistence, which limit the effectiveness of conventional treatments. This study addresses the challenges by exploring antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) derived from ameloblastin (AMBN), a protein integral to dental biomineralization and categorized as an intrinsically disordered protein. In humans, the AMBN gene encodes two isoforms, ISO I and ISO II, with distinct but not fully understood functions. Four AMBN ISO I-derived peptides (A, Am, B, Bm) were designed, synthesized, and tested for antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity. Peptides A and Am moderately inhibited biofilms of E. faecalis, S. aureus, and E. coli (MBIC₅₀ within 50-300 µM), including resistant isolates, while B and Bm were more effective against Gram-positive strains, showing the strongest effect against methicillin-resistant S. aureus CNCTC 6271. Cytotoxicity assays showed > 90% cell viability at 50 µM and IC₅₀ >100 µM for HCT116 and > 300 µM for HUVEC cells, with haemolytic activity > 300 µM. Stable immobilization of peptides on titanium surfaces was confirmed by XPS and QCM-D techniques, supporting their potential as low-toxicity antimicrobial coatings for medical implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.