Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331873›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2025

Continuity of maternal and newborn health service provision among private sector players following donor transition. Hope amidst challenging implementation experiences in Uganda.

Eric Ssegujja, Justine Namakula, Allen Kabagenyi, Carol Kyozira, Timothy Musila, Henry Zakumumpa, Freddie Ssengooba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric SsegujjaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. ssega2001@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7732-1019
Justine NamakulaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-6784-2996
Allen KabagenyiDepartment of Statistics and Population Studies, College of Business and Management Studies, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-2185-7535
Carol KyoziraMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Timothy MusilaMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Henry ZakumumpaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-1151
Freddie SsengoobaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-3489-0745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupporting service delivery through the private sector is a policy priority for improving maternal and child health service delivery for UHC. Despite the increased attention, it is not clear how pay-for-performance interventions within the private sector perform post-donor transition. This study aimed to examine the impact of donor transition on private service providers' ability to deliver maternal and newborn health in Uganda.

methodsAn exploratory qualitative study was conducted in Uganda's Rwenzori and Lango sub-regions, which benefited from a USAID project to reduce maternal and newborn deaths from 2012 to 2016 in Rwenzori and 2015-2020 in the Lango sub-region. A purposive sample of 52 respondents (Rwenzori = 26, Lango = 16, National = 10) took part in the study. A thematic analysis technique was followed, guided by the components of the health systems dynamics framework, with data management supported by Atlas. ti a qualitative data management software.

resultsOverall, results reflect a mix of progress and setbacks following the cessation of donor funding to the participating private health service providers. The subnational governance to provide oversight to the private sector was strengthened, which extended into the post-transition period. Despite setbacks in the provision of a comprehensive MNCH package, such as a drastic reduction in patient volumes, reduced scope of services offered and inconsistent supply of emergency medicines, the popularisation of MNCH services among the private sector players created awareness of the same post-transition. The information systems built with donor support contributed to improved data reporting from the private sector, which was sustained post-transition. Human resources for health among private sector players were greatly affected post-transition, although the same benefited the public sector with an experienced pool of health workers from which they recruited into public service. Despite the continued use of equipment procured during donor support, the medicines and supplies were greatly affected by funding cessation. Equally affected was the financing following donor cessation to the private sector players post-transition.

conclusionDespite the mixed results following donor cessation of funding to the private sector, these results have important implications for supporting private sector players to improve MNCH services in low-resource settings. The governance, health information systems, and service delivery experiences are critical aspects worth emulating for better engagement of the private sector in strengthening MNCH service delivery. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Maternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesPrivate SectorFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyQualitative ResearchUgandaCoverage maintenanceDonor transitionMaternal and child healthPrivate sectorSustainability

Identifiers

PMID41331873
PMCPMC12781606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.