ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Influence of non-clinical factors on emergency department decision-making: a Delphi study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisposition decisions in the emergency department (ED) are expected to rely primarily on clinical need, yet in practice, non-clinical factors frequently shape outcomes. These influences are poorly documented and rarely prioritized systematically. This study sought to achieve consensus among ED physicians on the most impactful non-clinical factors affecting admission decisions.
methodsWe conducted a two-round Delphi survey among 34 ED physicians across Israel. Candidate non-clinical factors were derived from prior research and classified into three domains: patient-related, physician-related, and system-related. Participants rated each factor on a Likert scale regarding its frequency of influence, and consensus was defined as ≥ 66% agreement. Non-parametric tests were used to assess associations with physician characteristics.
resultsConsensus was reached for all 21 factors after two Delphi rounds. Patient-related factors such as personal preference and family support were rated as commonly influential, while socioeconomic status was considered rarely influential. Physician-related factors including years of experience, field of expertise, and fatigue were commonly influential, whereas gender and cultural background were not. Among system-related factors, inpatient bed capacity and home care availability were frequently influential, whereas adherence to quality indicators and ED arrival time were rarely considered determinants. No significant variation was observed across physician subgroups.
conclusionThis Delphi study highlights that ED admission decisions are shaped not only by clinical needs but also by contextual non-clinical factors spanning patient, physician, and system domains. Recognizing and addressing these influences may support more standardized, equitable, and efficient ED decision-making and inform targeted interventions at institutional and policy levels. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.