Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331863›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Designing equity-focused sanitation policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: the critical role of subnational data.

Alpha Umaru Bai-Sesay, Baba Bangura, Gassimu Bai-Sesay, Jusu Musa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alpha Umaru Bai-SesayMinistry of Health, National Public Health Agency, Freetown, Sierra Leone. umarbaisesay@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6137-4870
Baba BanguraMinistry of Health, National Public Health Agency, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Gassimu Bai-SesayInsights for Development Impact, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Jusu MusaMinistry of Health, National Public Health Agency, Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen defecation remains a major public health and equity challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa, where national averages often mask profound subnational disparities. Progress toward Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.2 depends not only on increasing coverage but on closing persistent rural-urban gaps. This study quantified the magnitude and national consequences of these inequities using harmonized 2022 data.

methodsWe analyzed WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) 2022 estimates for 20 low- and lower-middle-income countries using four standard inequality metrics: the absolute difference (D), rate ratio (R), population attributable risk (PAR), and population attributable fraction (PAF). These indicators quantify both the scale of rural-urban gaps and the portion of the national burden attributable to rural disadvantage. Countries were grouped into a three-tier equity typology based on national prevalence and the size of the rural-urban gap.

resultsNational open-defecation prevalence ranged from 0.1% (Gambia) to 67.0% (Eritrea), with rural rates consistently and substantially higher than urban rates. In most countries, rural residents were three to ten times more likely to practise open defecation than urban residents. PAR and PAF results showed that eliminating rural disadvantage would reduce national prevalence by up to 40-60% points in the most unequal settings. Countries clustered into three profiles: high burden with extreme inequity (n = 6), moderate burden with persistent inequity (n = 10), and low burden with residual inequity (n = 4). We found that eliminating the rural disadvantage could reduce the national prevalence of open defecation by up to 40% points in the most unequal settings, demonstrating that equity is central to achieving SDG 6.2.

conclusionsOpen defecation in Sub-Saharan Africa is overwhelmingly concentrated in rural populations, making inequity, not simply low coverage, the central barrier to achieving SDG 6.2. Integrating simple equity metrics such as D, R, PAR, and PAF into national monitoring systems can help governments identify priority populations, estimate potential gains from reducing disparities, and target investments more efficiently and fairly. Equity-focused sanitation strategies are therefore essential to ensuring that no community is left behind.

Indexed as

DefecationHealth EquitySanitationAfrica South of the SaharaDeveloping CountriesHumansRural PopulationSustainable DevelopmentUrban PopulationEquity metricsOpen defecationRural-urban disparitiesSanitation inequitiesSDG 6.2Sub-Saharan africa, sanitation policies

Identifiers

PMID41331863
PMCPMC12777103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.