Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331856›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Haplotype-based autoencoders can reduce the dataset dimension and estimate haplotype block effects in different crop species.

Philipp Georg Heilmann, Emanuel Grosch, Matthias Frisch, Matthias Herrmann, Steffen Beuch, Vivek Kurra, Martin Mascher, Raz Avni, Klaus Oldach, Ina Röhrs and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Philipp Georg HeilmannInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany. philipp.g.heilmann@agrar.uni-giessen.de.
Emanuel GroschInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Matthias FrischInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Matthias HerrmannResearch on Agricultural Crops, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding, Julius Kühn Institute, Rudolf-Schick-Platz 3a, 18190, Sanitz, Germany.
Steffen BeuchSaatzucht Granskevitz, Nordsaat Saatzucht GmbH, Granskevitz 3, 18569, Schaprode, Germany.
Vivek KurraSaatzucht Bauer GmbH & Co. KG, Landshuter Str. 3a, 93083, Obertraubling, Germany.
Martin MascherLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Raz AvniLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Klaus OldachKWS Lochow GmbH, Ferdinand-von-Lochow-Str. 5, 29303, Bergen, Germany.
Ina RöhrsResearch & Breeding Dottenfelderhof, Landbauschule Dottenfelderhof e.V., Dottenfelderhof 1, 61118, Bad Vilbel, Germany.
Anja HanemannSaatzucht Josef Breun GmbH & Co. KG, Amselweg 1, 91074, Herzogenaurach, Germany.
Raja Ram MehtaSaatzucht Bauer GmbH & Co. KG, Landshuter Str. 3a, 93083, Obertraubling, Germany.
Carsten ReinbrechtSaatzucht Streng-Engelen GmbH & Co. KG, Aspachhof, 97215, Uffenheim, Germany.
Albrecht SerflingInstitute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Julius Kühn Institute, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Andreas StahlInstitute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Julius Kühn Institute, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Marco StuckeSaatzucht Streng-Engelen GmbH & Co. KG, Aspachhof, 97215, Uffenheim, Germany.
Amine AbbadiNPZ Innovation GmbH, Hohenlieth-Hof, 24363, Holtsee, Germany.
Tobias KoxNPZ Innovation GmbH, Hohenlieth-Hof, 24363, Holtsee, Germany.
Carola Zenke-PhilippiInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn plant breeding, many studies currently investigate the application of machine learning (ML) to genomic prediction, hoping for an improvement in prediction accuracy compared to standard models like Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP). However, ML algorithms require much higher computational resources. This study aims to reduce the computational requirements and speed up training time by developing a novel autoencoder architecture inspired by haplotype blocks. Our approach incorporates prior knowledge on genetic linkage, inspired by haplotype block building, into the autoencoder architecture, resulting in a new encoded variable per haplotype block. We further modified our model into a semi-supervised version by adding available yield information. We used features extracted from the autoencoder’s block layer as inputs for Random Forest and GBLUP models to predict the yield of hybrid and inbred crops.

resultsGenomic prediction based on the extracted features maintained prediction accuracies equal to using the original marker data, even with a variable reduction of up to 98% and significantly reduced computation time. Prediction accuracy of the supervised component was in some cases equal to and in some lower than the prediction accuracy achieved using GBLUP. Effects estimated for haplotype block variants using our new method showed a high correlation to the blockwise sum of marker effects, which is the current standard approach for haplotype block effects. Correlation between the two block effect estimation approaches was very low for some blocks, which might indicate the incorporation of non-linear effects by the autoencoder.

conclusionsOur approach introduces a new perspective on processing haplotype blocks for genomic prediction, potentially providing more flexible modelling opportunities without the use of multiple binary dummy variables for each block variant. Additionally, training time for ML models may be significantly reduced by using the reduced feature sets generated using our method. By adding the semi-supervised component, the model is able to estimate values similar to marker effects for each block on yield. In future work, this may provide a new way of quantifying the importance of haplotype blocks for selection and breeding.

Indexed as

AutoencoderCrops, AgriculturalHaplotypesGenomicsMachine LearningPlant BreedingPrediction AlgorithmsAutoencodersDimensionality reductionGenomic predictionHaplotype blocksMachine learningNeural networksPlant breeding

Identifiers

PMID41331856
PMCPMC12670737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.