Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331821›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of pain and respiratory function following mastopexy with augmentation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Esteban Fortuny Pacheco, Tomas Valverde Lyons, Richard Eloin Liebano

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06202794 (Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain and Respiratory Function Following Mastopexy With Augmentation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06202794 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain and Respiratory Function Following Mastopexy With Augmentation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFinis Terrae UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled84ConditionsPostoperative Pain, Respiratory ComplicationArmsExperimental: Experimental group, Sham Comparator: Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Esteban Fortuny PachecoExercise Science Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical Therapy, Finis Terrae University, Santiago, 7501015, Chile. efortunyp@uft.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0864-5669
Tomas Valverde LyonsSalvador University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7805-2375
Richard Eloin LiebanoPhysiotherapeutic Resources Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4795-6723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain after breast plastic surgery affects quality of life. Physical therapy offers effective interventions for this condition, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Although this resource has been used for more than 20 years, no studies have been published that support its use following this type of surgery. Therefore, the aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the effect of TENS on pain intensity in patients undergoing mastopexy with implants, given the existing evidence on the success of TENS for other conditions.

methodsA two-arm, randomized, sham-controlled trial will be conducted with blinded assessors. The study will be carried out at the Exercise Physiology and Metabolism Lab of Finis Terrae University. Eligible participants will be women undergoing mastopexy with implants invited by a board-certified plastic surgeon. The participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups: Group 1 (surgery + TENS) and Group 2 (surgery + sham TENS). TENS will be administered only 1 h after surgery and will remain for 1 h. Four assessments will be performed: before treatment (T0), immediately after treatment (T1), 1 h (T2), and 4 h after TENS (T3). The primary outcome will be pain intensity at rest, pain intensity during movement (standardized movements of both arms: anterior flexion, abduction, and external rotation), and during respiratory function tests. Secondary outcome measures will be maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and vital capacity (VC). DISCUSSION: In this study, the effects of TENS on patients with pain following mastopexy with implants will be compared to the effects of a sham TENS intervention. This RCT will offer novel evidence on the potential benefits of TENS in terms of pain intensity at rest as well as during movements and respiratory function tests.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06202794. Registered on January 11, 2024.

Indexed as

MammaplastyPostoperative PainRespirationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultFemaleHumansPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultClinical trial protocolMastopexyPhysical therapy modalitiesPlastic surgeryTENS

Identifiers

PMID41331821
PMCPMC12777217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.