ArticleBMC health services research2025
Patient demographics, diagnoses, and care needs in a Norwegian Community Virtual Ward versus Skilled Nursing Facility: a longitudinal comparative cohort study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The FHJ debate: There is no evidence for the drive towards virtual wards.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the early 2000s, Virtual Wards have referred to models where patients receive care at home rather than in traditional healthcare facilities. In 2021, the municipality of Bodø, Norway established a Community Virtual Ward (CVW) model, offering enhanced medical follow-up for older home residents. Unlike previous models, this CVW is fully municipality operated, features broad inclusion criteria, and includes a dedicated physician. The initiative responds to challenges related to longevity, frailty and task-shifting from hospitals to primary care. This study aimed to compare patient demographics and care needs between a CVW and a traditional Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), and to access whether the CVW model can serve as a viable alternative to institutional care.
methodsA longitudinal comparative cohort study was conducted with 55 participants transitioning from hospital to either a CVW or a SNF. Data on demographics, frailty, functional independence, and service utilization were collected at admission, discharge, and three months post-discharge. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to identify predictors of recovery and service needs.
resultsCVW patients were younger, had fewer chronic conditions, lower frailty levels, and shorter admission periods compared to SNF patients. Across both groups, baseline frailty and functional independence at discharge were key determinants of recovery and service utilization 90 days post-discharge. Differences between groups were statistically significant for frailty, functional scores, and length of stay. Comorbidities were associated with smaller improvements during the inpatient stay but did not predict longer-term recovery.
conclusionThe findings suggest that the CVW model is a viable alternative to short-term institutional care for mildly frail patients who benefit from rehabilitation-focused, home-based services. SNFs remain essential for frailer individuals requiring intensive support. The results highlight the need for systematic frailty assessment in primary care to optimize care pathways for aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.