ArticleHuman genomics2025
Ancestry-dependent patterns of somatic mosaicism and clonal hematopoiesis mutations in over 125,000 individuals reveal distinct cancer associations.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mutation-specific impairment of TET2 and DNMT3A enzymatic activity predicts clonal hematopoiesis disease risk.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Epigenetic corepressor BCORL1 predominates as a driver of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis: a multicenter cohort study.Human genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Somatic mosaicism (SM), the presence of somatic mutations, is classified as clonal hematopoiesis (CH) when it occurs in hematopoietic cells at an age-related rate. CH is associated with risk for hematologic malignancies and cardiovascular disease, but most studies are predominately based on individuals of European ancestry. Using peripheral blood whole exome sequencing data from 125,748 individuals of diverse genetic ancestries, we cataloged 503,703 SM mutations based on low variant allele frequency distributions and 89,361 CH variants based on age-skewing. We examined CH prevalence across ancestry groups, including commonly recognized pathogenic variants in myeloid (M-CHIP) and lymphoid (L-CHIP) malignancies. CH and M-CHIP variants had the highest prevalence in the European non-Finnish ancestry group, and males trended toward more M-CHIP variants. Ancestry differences in CH included more mutations in NF1 in African/African American, TP53 in European, and CUX1 in Asian and Latino/Admixed American ancestry groups. Linking the identified CH variants to a cancer database, CH was detected in 14% (55,190/391,102) of patient tumors. Prevalence of CH variants in some solid tumors ranged from 25% − 40%. M-CHIP variants in solid tumors were associated with younger age (61 vs. 63, p < 0.001), while M-CHIP in hematologic malignancies was linked to older age (60 vs. 50, p < 0.001), suggesting differences in disease biology. This study provides a catalog of SM, CH, and CHIP variants across diverse ancestry groups, highlighting differences that are important to inform clinical care, drug discovery, and study design to maximize generalizability across individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.