Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331755›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Experiences of EU and non-EU internationally educated nurses and midwives in the UK: a scoping review.

Daisy Mpando, Yingxi Zhao, Mike English, Attakrit Leckcivilize

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daisy Mpando *NDM Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, S Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SY, UK.
Yingxi Zhao *NDM Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, S Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SY, UK. yingxi.zhao@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Mike EnglishNDM Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, S Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SY, UK.
Attakrit LeckcivilizeNDM Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, S Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe UK's health and care system is increasingly dependent on international recruitment to fill workforce gaps. In 2022-2023, nearly half of new Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) registrants were internationally educated nurses and midwives (IENs), with most coming from non-EU countries such as India, the Philippines, and Nigeria. While European Union (EU) nurses played a substantial role in NHS recruitment during the early 2010s, Brexit and subsequent immigrant policy changes contributed to a decline in EU recruit and a shift toward non-EU sources. This shift highlights the importance of understanding the differing experiences of EU and non-EU IENs. This scoping review explores recent literature on IENs' experiences in the UK, with attention to similarities and differences between these groups.

methodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycINFO, EBSCOhost CINAHL, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed articles that explored the experiences of IENs in the UK between 2010-2024. Three reviewers screened articles for eligibility, and data were charted and coded thematically.

resultsThirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. We identified eight key themes: (1) migration motivation, (2) registration processes, (3) workplace adaptation, (4) deskilling and recognition, (5) discrimination, (6) job satisfaction, (7) social integration, and (8) coping and support. IENs frequently migrated in search of better professional opportunities but encountered complex processes. Many struggled to adapt to the workplace, with non-EU IENs more likely to report deskilling, limited recognition of prior experience, and visa-related restrictions. Discrimination was a persistent issue, particularly for Black and non-EU IENs, leading to poor job satisfaction and career progression. EU nurses, while previously benefitting from automatic qualification recognition, increasingly reported marginalisation following Brexit. While some IENs reported receiving good support from their employers and managers, others described inconsistent or absent support, and many relied heavily on religion or informal peer networks, especially from shared cultural or national backgrounds.

conclusionIENs in the UK face diverse barriers spanning regulation, professional adaptation, social integration, and discrimination. These challenges vary by region of origin, particularly between EU and non-EU IENs. As international recruitment continues, tailored and sustained action is needed to improve IENs' integration, retention, and wellbeing.

Indexed as

BullyingIntegrationMigrationNHSOverseas nurse

Identifiers

PMID41331755
PMCPMC12673689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.