ArticleGlia2026
AMPA Receptors in NG2 Glia Differently Affect Signal Transduction in the Hippocampus and Cerebellum.
Article in Glia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gray matter NG2 glia constitute a heterogeneous population of cells whose functions remain incompletely understood. In the hippocampus, Schaffer collaterals activate AMPA receptors (AMPARs) in NG2 glia, giving rise to small excitatory post-synaptic currents (EPSCs). Climbing fibers of the cerebellum also form synapses with NG2 glia, although producing much larger EPSCs. We aimed to identify mechanisms generating these regional differences in the efficacy of neuron-glia synapses. Combined patch-clamp and RT-PCR analyses allowed for determining structural and functional differences of AMPARs expressed by the glial cells. Comparing pharmacological and molecular data in both regions revealed stronger expression of Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.