ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2026
Length of the Adult Human Colon in Health and Constipation Measured Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Length of the Adult Human Colon in Health and Constipation Measured Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative data on colon length in adult chronic constipation (CC) are lacking. This study aimed to measure the length of the colon in CC, in the undisturbed state and after an osmotic laxative challenge, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as compared to healthy volunteers (HV) and IBS-C patients.
methodsSegmental and total colon length were measured by manual tracing on fasting MRI scans, retrieved retrospectively for 57 HV, 17 CC, and nine patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). In all CC patients and 22 HV, MRI scans were also performed after an oral osmotic laxative challenge. Participants' age range was 18-75 years. KEY
resultsCC patients showed significantly longer colons (162 ± 6 cm) than HV (127 ± 2 cm; p < 0.01), with 10/17 being longer than the upper limit of normal. Colon length in IBS-C (129 ± 6 cm) was similar to HV. The colon in HV was able to elongate from 133 ± 3 to 148 ± 4 cm (p < 0.0001) to accommodate the macrogol challenge influx, while the CC colon could not do so (from total length at baseline 162 ± 6 to 168 ± 5 cm; p = 0.0768). CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: The study provides normative values of colon length, to which CC and IBS-C are compared. CC was associated with increased colon length and reduced capacity to elongate longitudinally, rather than radially, in response to a laxative challenge. Colon length in IBS-C was similar to HV. These measurements can improve our understanding of gut disease pathophysiology and response to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.