Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331706›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

The Veggie Vouchers intervention to promote SNAP fruit and vegetable incentive program use for families with food insecurity: a single arm feasibility study.

Elizabeth L Adams, Meghan Savidge, Layton Reesor-Oyer, Carrie Draper, Elizabeth Anderson Steeves, Melanie K Bean, Roger Figueroa, Katie Stephenson, R Glenn Weaver, Bridget Armstrong and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06593028 (Feasibility of a Pilot Intervention Designed to Increase SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program Use for Families With Food Insecurity), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06593028 phase1completednot on this map

Feasibility of a Pilot Intervention Designed to Increase SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program Use for Families With Food Insecurity

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of South CarolinaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled91ConditionsDietary HabitsArmsVeggie Vouchers pilot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth L AdamsDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. elizabeth-adams@sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-8470
Meghan SavidgeDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Layton Reesor-OyerDepartment of Health Education and Behavior, College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, PO Box 118210, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Carrie DraperDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Elizabeth Anderson SteevesCenter for Nutrition and Health Impact, 14301 FNB Parkway, Suite 100, Omaha, NE, 68154, USA.
Melanie K BeanDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, 2303N. Parham Road, Suite 1, Richmond, VA, 23229, USA.
Roger FigueroaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, 116 Reservoir Avenue, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Katie StephensonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia, 14 Medical Park Road, Suite 400, Columbia, SC, 29203, USA.
R Glenn WeaverDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Bridget ArmstrongDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Michael BeetsDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Sarah BurkartDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Funding

Targeting Behavioral Adjustment and Healthy Lifestyle in Preschool-Age Children Using an Integrated Family-Based InterventionP20GM130420 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI COOPER, DANIEL KABAT · 2020 to 2024
$11.2M
UCSF Research in Implementation Sciences for Equity (RISE)R25HL126146 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRYSTAL WILEY CENE, Alicia Fernandez · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
NHLBI Division of Intramural Research R25HL126146 sub-contract #13972scNHLBI NIH HHS R25 HL126146NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130420NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM130420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has financial incentive programs where recipients can purchase fruits and vegetables (F&V) at select sites for half price or less, leading to increased F&V consumption and projected savings in healthcare costs. Yet, limited awareness and uptake of these programs present barriers to widespread utilization, thus limiting potential impact.

objectiveThe Veggie Vouchers intervention was designed to increase awareness and uptake of a SNAP F&V incentive program in South Carolina among families with children 2-17 years of age. The primary aim of this study was to determine intervention feasibility and acceptability among caregivers and pediatricians. Patterns of preliminary efficacy were secondarily examined for changes in diet-related outcomes.

methodsThis single-arm feasibility study leveraged social determinants of health screenings in a pediatric clinic to identify families who were eligible for a SNAP F&V incentive program. Eligible caregivers received brief education about this program from their pediatrician and an initial free trial to incentivize uptake. Free trial redemption rates were tracked, along with subsequent SNAP F&V incentive program use after the free trial ended. Surveys assessed intervention acceptability and changes in household food security, nutrition security, and children's dietary intake.

resultsCaregivers (n = 91; 100% female; 77% Black) and pediatricians (n = 37) were enrolled within 10 months. Most caregivers (70.3%) used their free trial (redeemers), with 58% of "non-redeemers" reporting transportation challenges as reasons for non-redemption. Over 91% of "redeemers" were satisfied with the amount, variety, and quality of F&V; 90.5% reported the free trial made it easier for them and their child to eat more F&V; and 18.8% utilized the SNAP F&V incentive program after the free trial ended. Most assessment time points achieved ≥ 70% survey completion rates. Pediatricians (88.9%) felt the intervention was easy to implement, and 100% reported minimal-to-no disruptions in clinic flow. Initial patterns indicated potential improvements in household food security and nutrition security throughout the intervention for "redeemers," compared to "non-redeemers".

conclusionsFindings support the feasibility and acceptability of the Veggie Vouchers intervention, yet additional strategies should be explored in a larger randomized controlled trial to enhance sustained SNAP F&V program use.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06593028. Retrospectively registered on September 11, 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06593028 .

Indexed as

Federal Food AssistanceFood securityLow incomeNutrition incentiveNutrition securityProduce incentiveSocial determinants of healthSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Identifiers

PMID41331706
PMCPMC12715973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.