Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331700›Full record

ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2025

Probiotic ice cream influences gut and vaginal microbiota in women at high risk of preterm birth: a randomized controlled study.

Leonora S Borum, Theda U P Bartolomaeus, Ronald F Lamont, Julie R Bagge, Lajos Markó, Christina A Vinter, Ulrike Löber, Ralf Dechend, Sofia K Forslund-Startceva, Jan S Joergensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leonora S Borum *Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4658-9362
Theda U P Bartolomaeus *Experimental and Clinical Research Center, A Cooperation of Charite- Universitatsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Ronald F LamontInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. rflamont@icloud.com.
Julie R BaggeDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lajos MarkóExperimental and Clinical Research Center, A Cooperation of Charite- Universitatsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Christina A VinterDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Ulrike LöberExperimental and Clinical Research Center, A Cooperation of Charite- Universitatsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf DechendExperimental and Clinical Research Center, A Cooperation of Charite- Universitatsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Sofia K Forslund-StartcevaExperimental and Clinical Research Center, A Cooperation of Charite- Universitatsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany. Sofia.Forslund@mdc-berlin.de.
Jan S JoergensenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch into probiotic use in pregnancy typically focuses on general probiotic strains. We instead investigated the relation between intake of ice cream with vaginal commensal probiotics (L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii, L. rhamnosus GR-1; these may govern a stable microbiota and may carry beneficial functions in the vagina), throughout pregnancy, and the impact on gut and vaginal microbiomes, in women at high risk of preterm birth.

methodsThis was a randomised controlled feasibility trial where the impact on gut and vaginal microbiomes was assessed by using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR. In total 43 pregnant women were randomized, with 29 assigned to the intervention group and 14 to the control group. Both groups provided vaginal and rectal swabs by self-sampling at gestational time points. Pregnancy outcomes were registered through hospital records, and ice cream adherence and study experience was recorded.

resultsWe observed statistically significant gut and vaginal Lactobacillus increase during first half of pregnancy in all women with a continued increase in the second half in women compliant with the intervention. L. crispatus was found more often in the intervention group, and L. gasseri, L. jensenii and L. rhamnosus GR-1 in the ice cream could be recovered in both rectal and vaginal samples. Finally, vaginal Prevotella spp, as well as gut Gardnerella and Atopobium spp, significantly decreased upon intervention. Adherence to the intervention varied but gradually decreased throughout the study with 30.4% displaying excellent adherence in the first time period.

conclusionsWe conclude that vaginal commensal probiotics administered in ice cream can be an effective method of optimizing the vaginal and intestinal health in pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth when administered regularly. We give recommendations for future studies.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov registration number 18/27209. Date of registration 03/25/2019. Date of first enrolment 04/08/2019.

Indexed as

16SFood fortificationIce creamLactobacillusLongitudinal samplingMicrobiomePregnancyPreterm birthProbioticsVaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID41331700
PMCPMC12673775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.