ArticleGenome biology2025
CRISPR-Cas9-induced double-strand breaks disrupt maintenance of epigenetic information.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing outcomes and mosaicism with near-perfect long reads.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9-based therapies for Huntington's disease and Friedreich's ataxia: mechanisms, advances, and future perspectives.Neurogenetics · 2026Review
- Cyanine-modified ssODNs enhance CRISPR-Cas9 HDR in stem cell embryo models via chromatin and chemical modulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Simultaneous orthogonal cell engineering by a single CRISPR-Cas9 polyfunctional editor.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Stable bioreactor control reveals acidic pH-driven metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial dysfunction in human lymphoblastoid cells.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Targeted native long-read sequencing of DNA methylation alterations following CRISPR-Cas9-induced double-strand breaks in human cells.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Clinical translation of CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics in cancer and inherited genetic disorders.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Cas9-induced double-strand breaks disrupt maintenance of epigenetic information.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCRISPR-Cas9 genome editing enables precise genetic modifications by introducing targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). While Cas9-induced DSBs are known to cause unintended on-target mutations, their impact on the epigenetic landscape remains unexplored.
resultsHere, we investigate how Cas9-induced DSBs affect DNA methylation patterns in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). We induce DSBs at differentially methylated regions of imprinted genomic loci and perform high-coverage, long-read native DNA sequencing to simultaneously obtain genetic variant and base-resolution methylation data in a haplotype-resolved manner. Our findings reveal that DSBs cause significant changes in DNA methylation at target sites through mechanisms including homologous recombination, large structural variations, or defective methylation maintenance during DNA repair. Notably, these epigenetic changes can occur either together with or independently of genetic alterations. Beyond imprinted loci, Cas9-induced DSBs significantly disrupt DNA methylation patterns of the MLH1 epimutation alleles in colorectal cancer cells, and hypermethylated heterochromatin loci in hESCs. Clonal analysis indicates that the aberrant methylation changes are stable during in vitro passaging. Intriguingly, significant changes in DNA methylation levels are also detected around endogenous deletions in unedited genomic regions, suggesting that methylation alterations are not unique to Cas9 nuclease activity but represent a general outcome of DSB repair in human cells.
conclusionsThis study underscores the importance of assessing and mitigating unintended epigenetic consequences in genome editing applications, as such changes can profoundly affect gene regulation and cellular function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.