Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331656›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Beyond Accuracy: A MultiDimensional Framework for Evaluating Medical Image Classification Through Win vs. Lose Model Comparisons.

Haixia Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Haixia LiuUniversity of the West of England Bristol, Gloucestershire, UK. haixia.liu@uwe.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-377X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-performing deep learning models such as ResNet, originally optimized for large-scale natural image datasets, often fail to generalize when applied directly to medical imaging tasks. This study investigates the limitations of "off-the-shelf" models in the context of skin lesion classification using the DermaMNIST dataset. Through a systematic evaluation of 35 architectural configurations across varying image resolutions and depths, the analysis reveals that mid-depth architectures (3-4 layers) and intermediate resolutions (

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSkin NeoplasmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansDeep learningDermaMNISTGrad-CAMMedical image classificationModel interpretabilityPerformance evaluationResNetRevNetWin-Lose comparison

Identifiers

PMID41331656
PMCPMC13481636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.