ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Comparative Performance Evaluation of Federated and Centralized Learning for Velum and OTE Segmentation in Sleep Endoscopy Images.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of upper airway structures such as the velum and OTE (oropharynx, tongue base, epiglottis) in drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) images is crucial for predicting the degree and location of obstruction to determine treatment options for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study systematically compares centralized learning (CL) and federated learning (FL) approaches for the semantic segmentation of these regions using multi-institutional DISE video data. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based segmentation model was trained and evaluated for both learning paradigms. The results consistently showed that the CL approach achieved statistically significantly higher segmentation performance across all metrics-precision, recall, accuracy, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)-for both the velum and OTE regions compared with FL. For the velum region, CL achieved a DSC of 85.91 ± 1.01%, compared with FL's 81.78 ± 0.58%. Similarly, for the OTE region, CL achieved an average DSC of 87.04 ± 0.41%, whereas FL achieved 85.20 ± 0.25%. Further analysis revealed that while both models struggled with ambiguous boundaries and anatomical variability-particularly for the tongue base-the epiglottis and oropharynx lateral wall were segmented with higher accuracy. These findings underscore the need for advanced techniques in FL, such as improved optimization algorithms and methods to address data heterogeneity, to narrow the performance gap with CL. This study provides foundational insights for developing more robust and clinically applicable deep learning models for upper airway analysis, emphasizing the importance of future research into advanced FL strategies and real-world validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.