Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331653›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025

Optimizing perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective cohort study on cefazolin utilization in surgical patients with penicillin allergy labels.

Cassius Mensah, Anvinh Nguyen, Jenny Pennycuff, Israa Shwaiki, Belle Parizot, Gary Zhang, Xiaofan Huang, Suman Rajagopalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cassius MensahMD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Cmensah@mdanderson.org.
Anvinh NguyenBaylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jenny PennycuffMD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Israa ShwaikiBaylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Belle ParizotBaylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Gary ZhangBaylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Xiaofan HuangInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Suite 100D (BCM 451), Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Suman RajagopalanBaylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPenicillin allergy labels frequently lead to second-line antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis, due to concerns for cross-reactivity. This has led to increased patient morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare costs. The most common perioperative cephalosporin, cefazolin, has unique R groups, the main antigenic portion of penicillin, which makes it safe to use in type 1 hypersensitivity penicillin allergy. We evaluated the effect of education on the incidence of the following: cefazolin usage in penicillin allergy labelled patients, allergic reactions, and surgical site infections.

methodsAs a prospective study with historical controls, perioperative clinicians were educated on the natural history of penicillin allergy, cross-reactivity with cephalosporins, and allergic reaction management. A questionnaire-based algorithm was provided as a guide for cefazolin use in penicillin allergy labelled patients. Chart reviews were conducted before and after educational interventions to assess cefazolin utilization and associated outcomes. 574 patients were included in the study (236 and 338 in the retrospective and prospective cohorts respectively). Participants were non-pregnant adults (≥ 18 years) with penicillin allergy labels undergoing surgery. Data analysis employed the Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests accordingly to compare the following variables: cefazolin use, administration of epinephrine for the treatment of allergy, and surgical site infections within 30 days of surgery. The primary outcome was to assess cefazolin utilization, with a secondary outcome comparing surgical site infections in first line versus second-line antibiotic administration.

resultsPatients with penicillin allergy labels having surgery where cefazolin was indicated for antibiotic prophylaxis were included. Concurrent antibiotic therapy or requiring alternative prophylaxis meant exclusion. Cefazolin administration significantly increased from 38% to 58% during the study period (89/236 vs. 196/338, p < 0.001). There was no evidence of allergic reactions to cefazolin amongst the patients. Documented use of epinephrine was accounted for by non-allergic indications. There was no significant difference in surgical site infection between the control and intervention group respectively (3.2% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.23).

conclusionsAntibiotic stewardship based on consensus guidelines led to a significant increase in cefazolin usage in patients with penicillin allergy labels. Employing this strategy has the potential to enhance patient safety, reduce surgical site infections, and mitigate healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Allergic reactionCefazolinPenicillin allergy labelPerioperative antibioticsSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID41331653
PMCPMC12777054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.