ArticleBMC medical education2025
Perspectives of Physical Therapists in Saudi Arabia on radiological interpretation: attitudes, engagement, and educational needs.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiological imaging is essential in clinical practice to support diagnosis and treatment planning. As Physical Therapists (PTs) increasingly collaborate within multidisciplinary teams, their ability to interpret radiographs has become more relevant. In Saudi Arabia, limited data exist concerning the involvement of PTs in radiological interpretation. Therefore, this study aimed to explore PTs’ engagement with radiological information, assess their attitudes, and examine the factors influencing their involvement in and interest in imaging education.
methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive study employed a self-structured questionnaire to gather data on demographics, professional characteristics, practice patterns, learning sources, perceived barriers, and attitudes. Chi-square tests were used to assess associations, and binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of interest in further education.
resultsAmong the 241 PTs surveyed, 46.1% reported frequent involvement in radiological interpretation, and 83.0% believed it should be part of their professional role. Academic education was the main learning source, while 40.0% identified insufficient training as a key barrier. Engagement levels and attitudes were significantly associated with qualification, experience, workplace setting, and specialization. Notably, PTs who rarely contributed were four times more likely to express interest in further education (OR = 4.0, 95% CI: 1.5–10.4, p = 0.007).
conclusionMany PTs in Saudi Arabia reported engaging in radiological interpretation, though the extent and accuracy of these contributions remain self-reported rather than objectively confirmed. Their involvement was influenced by education, clinical experience, and workplace setting. The findings highlight the need to integrate imaging content into national curricula and continuing professional development programs. Enhancing these competencies has the potential to strengthen collaborative care and may contribute to improved clinical decision-making and healthcare outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.