ArticleImplementation science : IS2025
Minimal progress toward sustainment: 10-year replication of substance use EBP sustainment trajectories and associations with implementation characteristics.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress in sustainment? Reflections on ongoing gaps and opportunities for the field of implementation science in response to Dopp et al., 2025.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver the past decade, implementation researchers have empirically identified factors influencing long-term sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to target in implementation efforts. We examined progress toward promoting sustainment by conducting a conceptual replication of a prior study (Hunter et al., 2015, Implementation Science) that measured sustainment of an exemplar EBP for youth substance use, the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA).
methodData were collected 1-5 years after initial implementation funding ended (M = 3.3 years) through interviews and surveys with clinicians and supervisors from service organizations that implemented A-CRA (n = 66). Using survival analysis, we calculated the probability of A-CRA sustainment (dichotomously reported [yes/no] in interviews) over time and examined associations with contextual factors across the multilevel domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We also combined our data with Hunter et al. (n = 68) to test if sustainment status or interactions with contextual factors differed by sample, and used rapid qualitative analysis of interviews to further explore patterns in the quantitative findings.
resultsIn our sample, A-CRA sustainment probability decreased over time; 71% of organizations were sustaining A-CRA when funding ended, whereas only 33% were sustaining 5 years later; this survival curve did not statistically differ from Hunter et al. Sustainment was significantly associated with factors across CFIR domains: we replicated associations found by Hunter et al. (with e.g., funding stability, available clinicians, intervention complexity) and found unique associations (with e.g., program evaluation and strategic planning capacities, available supervisors, and perceived advantages and success of A-CRA). One association from the prior sample did not fully replicate (p < .10), but there were no significant interactions between contextual factors and sample. Qualitative findings further contextualized these results with service organization perspectives on factors influencing sustainment.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that work over the past decade promoting sustainment of EBPs for youth substance use may not have produced measurable impacts. Future work needs to better incorporate growing knowledge on sustainment predictors into development and testing of robust, multilevel implementation strategies and system-level supports. This study also provides a useful illustration of a replication study in implementation science, which are important but rare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.