ArticleBMC medicine2025
Disparities in the use of remote general practice consultations: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic, an analysis of 19 million electronic health records using OpenSAFELY.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital technologies are crucial to drive the needed improvement in NHS primary care delivery and access. The impact of these digital interventions on health inequalities remains a critical area of concern and uncertainty. Transition to digital primary care services was rapidly accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored what can be learnt from this transition to digital access by examining the patterns of remote general practice consultation before and after the pandemic and the influence of age, gender, social deprivation, and ethnicity on these patterns.
methodsThis is a longitudinal study in primary care settings involving data from19 million men and women aged 18 + years registered with general practices in England between January 2019 and February 2022 using the OpenSAFELY platform. The main outcome was remote consultation (telephone, video, or electronic) of all appointments recorded by GPs. Binomial regression models including marginal effect probabilities were used to analyse the proportion of remote consultations in all appointments. Covariates including age, gender, deprivation, and ethnicity were adjusted for in the models.
resultsRemote consultations increased from 10.1 million per annum (March 2019 to March 2020) to 32.7 million per annum during the pandemic (March 2020 to March 2022). Pre-pandemic, 85 + year olds had the highest probability of remote consultation (0.133, 95% CI [0.132-0.133]). In the pandemic period, the probability of remote consultation increased for all age groups with those aged 18-49 years having the highest probability of remote consultation and those aged 85 + having the second highest probability. Men were less likely to have remote consultations than women pre-pandemic and in the 2 years after the pandemic started. Before the pandemic, the most affluent group (5th deprivation quintiles) had the lowest probability of having consultation being held remotely (0.086, 95% CI [0.086-0.086]), a trend that was maintained through the first 2 years of the pandemic. White ethnic group had the highest probabilities of remote consultations across the study period.
conclusionsThere were significant variations in remote consultations by age, gender, socioeconomic group, and ethnicity during the pandemic. These factors should be considered when planning access to services especially for vulnerable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.