ArticleBMC cancer2025
Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma using serum tumor markers integrated with inflammatory and liver function indices.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrovascular invasion (MVI) critically portends early recurrence and poor survival in intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) but is ascertainable only after resection. An accurate pre-operative predictor of MVI would aid surgical planning in everyday practice.
objectiveTo develop and internally validate a blood-based model that integrates serum tumor markers with inflammatory and liver-function indices for pre-operative estimation of MVI in ICC.
methodsThis single-center, retrospective, non-interventional cohort included consecutive adults who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy for pathologically proven ICC and completed 3-year follow-up between January 2019 and December 2024. Of 602 patients screened, 450 met eligibility criteria after excluding cases with mixed histology, neoadjuvant therapy, macro-vascular invasion, or missing key data. Pre-operative variables (drawn ≤ 14 days before surgery) comprised CA19-9, CEA, AFP, CA-125, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), γ-glutamyl-transferase (γ-GT), albumin, maximum tumor diameter, and lesion multiplicity. Predictors were selected by LASSO, and a shrinkage-adjusted logistic model was internally validated with 1,000-bootstrap resamples. Performance was benchmarked against a tumor-marker-only model and evaluated for clinical utility using decision-curve analysis (DCA). Associations between model-predicted risk, early recurrence (≤ 12 months), and overall survival were explored with Cox regression.
resultsAmong 450 eligible patients (median age 58 y; 64.2% male), microvascular invasion (MVI) was present in 40.4% (182/450). The final model retained log‑transformed CA 19‑9, CEA, NLR and γ‑GT together with albumin, tumor size and lesion multiplicity. Its apparent and optimism‑corrected AUCs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.76–0.84) and 0.78, respectively—outperforming the tumor‑marker baseline (corrected AUC 0.68; ΔAUC + 0.10). Across clinically relevant thresholds of 12.0–38.0% the extended model delivered consistently higher net benefit than both the baseline and “treat‑all” strategies. Patients assigned to the high‑risk tier (> 29.5% predicted probability; n = 169) showed markedly higher early‑recurrence rates (52.8% vs. 18.6%; adjusted HR 2.9, 95% CI 2.1–4.0) and lower three‑year overall survival (44.3% vs. 72.1%; adjusted HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5–3.0).
conclusionsA composite model that integrates routine serum tumor markers with inflammatory and liver‑function indices shows strong internal discrimination for pre‑operative estimation of MVI in ICC. Because this is a single‑center, HBV-enriched Chinese cohort, generalizability to other settings and etiologies is uncertain. External, multicenter validation and site‑specific recalibration are warranted before clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.