Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331528›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Predictive factors and a nomogram for hemodynamic instability during operation in patients with pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

Wenqiang Qi, Shangzhen Geng, Yinrui Xiang, Chenhao Wang, Huangwei Huang, Shiqian Wu, Pengzhong Ding, Yinchao Wang, Peixin Li, Zhiyang Yu and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Wenqiang QiDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Shangzhen GengDepartment of Urology, Tianqiao District, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, No. 11, Wujingshan Middle Road, Jinan City, 250000, Shandong Province, China.
Yinrui XiangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Chenhao WangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Huangwei HuangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Shiqian WuDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Pengzhong DingDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Yinchao WangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Peixin LiDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Zhiyang YuDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Yangyang XiaDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Jianfeng CuiDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Guangping WuDepartment of Urology, Rizhao Central Hospital, No. 66, Wanghai Road, Rizhao City, 276800, Shandong Province, China.
Benkang ShiDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Xuewen JiangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China. Xwjiang@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

Innovation Group of Jinan 202228081National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170790Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2023QH010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative hemodynamic instability (HDI) remains a significant challenge during surgery for pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs), despite preoperative preparation. Identifying predictive factors is crucial for risk stratification and management optimization.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 203 PPGLs patients undergoing surgery at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (July 2019-February 2025). HDI was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg or mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg during surgery. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, tumor features (including maximum diameter measured on CT), preoperative catecholamine/metabolite levels, and preoperative preparation adequacy (based on BP/HR records) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors. A predictive nomogram was constructed using significant factors and validated internally.

resultsAmong 203 patients, 133 (65.5%) experienced intraoperative HDI. Multivariate analysis identified four independent preoperative predictors: maximum tumor diameter > 49.5 mm (odds ratio (OR) = 3.169, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.531-6.562, P = 0.002), preoperative hypertension history (OR = 2.636, 95% CI: 1.293-5.375, P = 0.008), elevated plasma adrenaline level (OR = 4.803, 95% CI: 1.977-11.666, P = 0.001), and inadequate preoperative preparation (OR = 0.251 for adequacy, 95% CI: 0.107-0.590, P = 0.002). A nomogram incorporating these factors demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.823, 95% CI: 0.761-0.886), significantly outperforming individual factors, and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.218). Decision curve analysis confirmed clinical utility.

conclusionMaximum tumor diameter > 49.5 mm, preoperative hypertension history, elevated plasma adrenaline, and inadequate preoperative preparation are key independent predictors of intraoperative HDI in PPGL surgery. The developed nomogram effectively integrates these factors to provide personalized preoperative risk assessment, aiding clinicians in identifying high-risk patients for intensified management strategies.

Indexed as

AdrenalectomyAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsHypotensionIntraoperative ComplicationsNomogramsParagangliomaPheochromocytomaAdultAgedFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentComplicationsHemodynamic instabilityNomogramPheochromocytomas and paragangliomasRisk factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.