ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Who may omit locoregional radiotherapy in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a failure-pattern-based strategy in the immunotherapy era.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The current role of immunotherapy in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
De novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC) is a heterogeneous disease that exhibits variable failure patterns after first-line immunochemotherapy, complicating the decision-making for subsequent locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT). This retrospective real-world analysis enrolled 398 dmNPC patients treated with first-line immunochemotherapy with or without subsequent LRRT. We developed and validated a clinically applicable two-step risk stratification model that categorizes patients into three phenotypic subgroups based on different failure patterns. Durable responders were defined as patients likely to achieve long-term remission with immunotherapy maintenance alone. Partial responders were prone to experience isolated locoregional progression, while resistant patients had a high risk of developing distant progression, regardless of locoregional control. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, LRRT significantly improved 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) in partial responders (69.8% vs. 45.1%, HR = 0.45, P < 0.001), but conferred no benefit in durable responders (81.4% vs. 73.4%, P = 0.28) or resistant patients (12.4% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.33). Our findings suggest that only patients prone to isolated locoregional progression may derive survival benefit from LRRT, while others could safely omit LRRT without compromising prognosis. A failure-pattern-based strategy could personalize LRRT decisions and guide future clinical trial design in the immunotherapy era.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.