ArticleEquine veterinary journal2026
The effect of full-limb flexion tests on static and dynamic muscle activity and locomotion asymmetry in owner-sound horses.
Article in Equine veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFlexion tests are commonly used in equine locomotion examinations to identify underlying locomotor issues, yet their neuromuscular effects remain poorly understood. Response variability raises concerns about their clinical value in lameness assessments and pre-purchase evaluations.
objectivesPrimarily, to investigate the effect of full-limb flexion tests on static (flexed position) and dynamic (subsequent trot-up) muscle activity. Secondarily, to assess their effect on locomotion asymmetry during trotting. STUDY
designIn vivo experiments.
methodsSixteen warmblood horses were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 4) for surface electromyography of selected limbs. Forelimb region muscles included Splenius muscle, Triceps brachii caput longus muscle, Longissimus dorsi muscle, Extensor digitorum communis muscle, and Ulnaris lateralis muscle, while hindlimb region muscles included Gluteus medius muscle, Biceps femoris muscle, Semitendinosus muscle, Extensor digitorum longus muscle, and Flexor digitorum profundus muscle. Electromyographic data were side-normalised, and kinematic data from inertial measurement units assessed asymmetry in head, withers, and pelvis. Each limb underwent a 60-s full-limb flexion test, followed by straight-line trotting. Muscle activity in static and dynamic phases was compared to baseline using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with statistical parametric mapping, respectively. Kinematic variables were compared using a linear mixed-effect model.
resultsNo significant differences in normalised muscle activity were observed in fore- or hindlimb region muscles during flexion or subsequent trotting. However, pelvic displacement increased during the suspension phase of the ipsilateral limb, with significant vertical displacement (MaxDiff) after left (8.4 mm ± 2.4 SE [standard error], p = 0.002) and right (8.1 mm ± 2.4 SE, p = 0.004) hindlimb flexion test. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Only full-limb flexion tests were investigated, limiting generalisability to distal or carpal/tarsal tests. Flexion force was not standardised.
conclusionsWe found no evidence that flexion tests affect equine neuromuscular functioning in the muscles we investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.